Low stakes hot take: the most important good things in git were already in rcs. rcs→cvs→svn→git is better overall at each step, but the benefit/complexity ratio gets worse at each step and most things git gets used for would be fine with rcs+patch.
Low stakes hot take: the most important good things in git were already in rcs. rcs→cvs→svn→git is better overall at each step, but the benefit/complexity ratio gets worse at each step and most things git gets used for would be fine with rcs+patch.