@prologic@twtxt.net That sure is a lot of water. :o
#ejsbv2q
@prologic@twtxt.net That sure is a lot of water. :o
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Me neither. I just knew him from “Die Anstalt” and such. (Honestly, I’m not sure if it’s my cup of tea, because they literally focus a lot on reading stuff … I like it more when they’re speaking freely. %)
@prologic@twtxt.net What the heck, that’s crazy. 😁
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Working fine on my end. 👌
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org I don’t think it went wrong. That’s the best you can get if you can’t change the exposure time. 😅
(And if you can change it, you’ll see nothing but the moon, no clouds anymore. Boom, you have to go for HDR. It’s really not that easy to take pictures of this little rock floating through space.)
@prologic@twtxt.net God dammit 🤣
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org It’d take a bit over an hour, they say. So they’re assuming a speed around 16kph – is that realistic?! 😅
Right, going with a bike on a highway isn’t going to be fun if things stay as they are now. But imagine the number of cars reduced to 10% and they’re only allowed to go ~30kph or maybe 50kph … Yeah, it’s never going to happen, I know. 😑
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Whoops, I forgot about that reply. But now that you’ve mentioned bikes in the other thread, I remembered … 😅
This is the height profile that Google has calculated: Looks exhausting, if you ask me. I never tried, though, I don’t even own a bike at the moment.
Fun fact: It’s 21km if you’re going by bike. Everything is optimized towards cars. I wish they would just dedicate one lane on the highway for bikes and the other lane has a limit of 30kph. Or something like that. 😐
And then, when I arrive at the office, I’d have no idea where to put my bike. If it’s just me, I’d find a spot, sure – but what if everyone does it? Turns out, it’s a bit of an unsolved problem. (But hey, if we wanted to do this, if we wanted to get people to use bikes, we’d find a solution. Even those underground parking garages in the video sound like a dream to me.)
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org I’ve never seen a bike like that. 😲 Actual chairs instead of those tiny saddles – is that as comfortable as I think it is? 😅
@mckinley@twtxt.net Ah, thanks, I missed that. (Yup, <link>
would be very handy – even though the major browsers ignore it these days …)
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Mostly, but I have some more debugging to do. Means: More time in the office. 😑
@marado@twtxt.net I’m not 100% sure yet if I understand the use case correctly. 🤔 Is this for setups where you can’t install redirects on the HTTP level? (Or maybe I’m just too dumb and the other guys understand it. 😅)
@mckinley@mckinley.cc The feed is not (yet) linked on your page, is it? 🤔
@mckinley@twtxt.net Yeah, it’s paid overtime, luckily.
@marado@twtxt.net So the point is: When you move from one pod to another, you start afresh on that new pod? You don’t take your current feed and the archived feeds with you?
Example:
prev = $hash foopod.example.com/twtxt-old-$hash.txt
in header of new feed at barpod; actual feed at barpod.example.com starts emptyIs that it? 🤔
(If yes, then this raises another question for me: What if I want to move from one pod to another and want to keep my entire feed? That’s would I, personally, would want. Like, when I open an account on a Yarn pod, there could be an “import this twtxt file” feature – dunno if that’s already possible.)
Well, that was a horrible day at work (on this lovely Saturday). Rack too small, room too small, shitty cable management, can’t even access the back of the rack, lots of swearing, took way longer than expected, … 😮💨
@prologic@twtxt.net @marado@twtxt.net IIRC, this was done deliberately: The fragment in feed_prev
is relative to the feed you’re currently fetching. Think multi-protocol feeds here.
Could you elaborate what you’re trying to do? 🤔
This is definitely going to be my next pet project. 😊 (As soon as my energy levels are no longer at 0%.)
@ullarah@txt.quisquiliae.com Gah, teeth are the worst. I hate them so much. 🤣 All the best to you!
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Errr, yes, it’s a “no”, not a “now”. I mean, it’s still flextime, so I’m going a little slower this week or next week. So at least there’s that.
Your situation sounds “lovely”. It’s very similar here when using public transportation (1:00-1:30 hours for one way). The sad thing is, using a car really is a lot faster here: Best case is 20 minutes. And it’s usually realistic to actually complete that trip in 20 minutes if you avoid the rush hours – which I can, see “flexibility” above. (Well, unless thing’s don’t go my way and I miss the golden window. 😅) Best case with public transportation is still roughly 1 hour. The reason is simple: It’s just 16km, but the bus does not use the highway but crawls through the inner city.
Commuting just sucks. 🤣
(Also, lol @ “even bummeliger Bahn” 😂)
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Hail? All the car owners: 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱😱
@prologic@twtxt.net I’m only 17 minutes into the talk, but that is suuuuper interesting. 😳
@hackernewsnewest@feeds.twtxt.net Ha, I love that idea. First time I hear about something like that. 🤔
(Original link: https://johnpublic.mataroa.blog/blog/the-asshole-test/)