The First New Subsea Habitat In 40 Years Is About To Launch
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MIT Technology Review: Vanguard feels and smells like a new RV. It has long, gray banquettes that convert into bunks, a microwave cleverly hidden under a counter, a functional steel sink with a French press and crockery above. A weird little toilet hides behind a curtain. But some clues hint that you canât just f ⌠â Read more
Why Does So Much New Technology Feel Inspired by Dystopian Sci-Fi Movies?
In a recent article published in the New York Times, author Casey Michael Henry argues that todayâs tech industry keeps borrowing dystopian sci-fi aesthetics and ideas â often the parts that were meant as warnings â and repackages them as exciting products without recognizing that they were originally cautionary tales ⌠â Read more
You do raise very good points though, but I donât think any of this is particularly new because there are many other examples of technology and evolution of change over time where people have forgotten certain skills like for example, changing a car tyre
A New Ion-Based Quantum Computer Makes Error Correction Simpler
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MIT Technology Review: The US- and UK-based company Quantinuum today unveiled Helios, its third-generation quantum computer, which includes expanded computing power and error correction capability. Like all other existing quantum computers, Helios is not powerful enough to execute the industryâs dream money- ⌠â Read more
Gemini AI To Transform Google Maps Into a More Conversational Experience
An anonymous reader quotes a report from the Associated Press: Google Maps is heading in a new direction with artificial intelligence sitting in the passengerâs seat. Fueled by Googleâs Gemini AI technology, the worldâs most popular navigation app will become a more conversational companion as part of a redesign announced Wednesda ⌠â Read more
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Gemini liked your opinion very much. Here is how it countered:
1. The User Perspective (Untrustworthiness)The criticism of AI as untrustworthy is a problem of misapplication, not capability.
- AI as a Force Multiplier: AI should be treated as a high-speed drafting and brainstorming tool, not an authority. For experts, it offers an immense speed gain, shifting the work from slow manual creation to fast critical editing and verification.
- The Rise of AI Literacy: Users must develop a new skillâAI literacyâto critically evaluate and verify AIâs probabilistic output. This skill, along with improving citation features in AI tools, mitigates the âgaslightingâ effect.
The fear of skill loss is based on a misunderstanding of how technology changes the nature of work; itâs skill evolution, not erosion.
- Shifting Focus to High-Level Skills: Just as the calculator shifted focus from manual math to complex problem-solving, AI shifts the focus from writing boilerplate code to architectural design and prompt engineering. It handles repetitive tasks, freeing humans for creative and complex challenges.
- Accessibility and Empowerment: AI serves as a powerful democratizing tool, offering personalized tutoring and automation to people who lack deep expertise. While dependency is a risk, this accessibility empowers a wider segment of the population previously limited by skill barriers.
The legal and technical flaws are issues of governance and ethical practice, not reasons to reject the core technology.
- Need for Better Bot Governance: Destructive scraping is a failure of ethical web behavior and can be solved with better bot identification, rate limits, and protocols (like enhanced
robots.txt). The solution is to demand digital citizenship from AI companies, not to stop AI development.
Javaâs Swing is allegedly in âmaintenance modeâ, so I doubt itâs a good idea to use it for new programs. For example, I very much doubt that it will ever support Wayland.
The replacement is supposed to be JavaFX, but thatâs not included in JREs â anymore! It used to be, now itâs not, even though itâs well over 15 years old now.
This whole thing (âJava GUIsâ) appears to have stagnated a lot. Probably because everything is web stuff these days âŚ
https://www.oracle.com/java/technologies/javafx/faq-javafx.html#6
Yeah technology is honestly quite garbage đď¸
20 years ago, normal people avoided technology and techies would jump on the newest gadgets as soon as they could
now, normal people buy smart toasters & coffee mugs while every techie I know is on the verge of retreating to the forest
@kat@yarn.girlonthemoon.xyz On the one hand, all these programs have a very long history and the technology behind manpages is actually very powerful â you can use it to write books:
https://www.troff.org/pubs.html
I have two books from that list, for example âThe UNIX programming environmentâ:
https://movq.de/v/c3dab75c97/upe.jpg
Itâs a bit older, of course, but it looks and feels like a normal book, and it uses the same tech as manpages â which I think is really cool. đ
Itâs comparable to LaTeX (just harder/different to use) but much faster than LaTeX. You can also do stuff like render manpages as a PDF (man -Tpdf cp >cp.pdf) or as an HTML file (man -Thtml cp >cp.html). I think I once made slides for a talk this way.
On the other hand, traditional manpages (i.e., ones that are not written in mandoc) do not use semantic markup. They literally say, âthis text is bold, that text over here is italicsâ, and so on.
So when you run man foo, it has no other choice but to show it in black, white, bold, underline â showing it in color would be wrong, because thatâs not what the source code of that manpage says.
Colorizing them is a hack, to be honest. Youâre not meant to do this. (The devs actually broke this by accident recently. They themselves arenât really aware that people use colors.)
If mandoc and semantic markup was more commonly used, I think it would be easier to convince the devs to add proper customizable colors.
setpriv on Linux supports Landlock.
@prologic@twtxt.net Yeah, itâs not a strong sandbox in jennyâs case, it could still read my SSH private key (in case of an exploit of some sort). But I still like it.
I think my main takeaway is this: Knowing that technologies like Landlock/pledge/unveil exist and knowing that they are very easy to use, will probably nudge me into writing software differently in the future.
jenny was never meant to be sandboxed, so it canât make great use of it. Future software might be different.
(And this is finally a strong argument for static linking.)
Ted Unangstâs snarky (and entertaining) remarks this month:
My vision with this newsletter is to have a slower medium for communicating about my art as well as ideas and projects Iâm working on regarding how we can use digital technology to our own benefits instead of being exploited by big tech.
Twtxt not sloe enough for you? đ¤Ł
Grokâs âdaddyâ teaching it the good stuff early on:
Elon Muskâs artificial intelligence chatbot Grok has been repeatedly mentioning âwhite genocideâ in South Africa in its responses to unrelated topics and telling users it was âinstructed by my creatorsâ to accept the genocide âas real and racially motivatedâ.
@movq@www.uninformativ.de I cases of these kind of âabuseâ of social trust. Then I think people should just delete their replies, unfollow the troll and leave them to shouting in the void. This is a inter-social issue, not a technical issue. Anything can be spoofed. We are not building a banking app, we are just having conversation and if trust are broken then communication breaks down. These edge-cases are all very hypothetical and not something I think we need to solve with technology.
On my blog: The Rise and (Likely) Fall of Anti-AI Licenses https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2024/03/03/ai-licenses.html #art #harm #rant #technology
On my blog: AI Doom Sounds So Familiar https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2024/02/25/ai-doom.html #art #harm #rant #technology
On my blog: The Return of AI Antics https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2024/01/21/paid-ai.html #art #harm #rant #technology
Not a surprise I guess.
âSam Altmanâs AI Hype Roadshowâ
âThe project of Altman and his merry band of doomsayers appears to be to capture power and create obfuscation by making new myths and legendsâ
âIt assumes that no one will pull back the curtain and expose it as a market-expansion strategyâ
Yes.
@darch@neotxt.dk I fully agree with this. As the well-worn saying goes, you cannot address social problems with technological solutions.
There is a ârightâ way to make something like GitHub CoPilot, but Microsoft did not choose that way. They chose one of the most exploitative options available to them. For that reason, I hope they face significant consequences, though I doubt they will in the current climate. I also hope that CoPilot is shut down, though Iâm pretty certain it will not be.
Other than access to the data behind it, Microsoft has nothing special that allows it to create something like CoPilot. The technology behind it has been around for at least a decade. There could be a âpublicâ version of this same tool made by a cooperating group of people volunteering, âleasingâ, or selling their source code into it. There could likewise be an ethically-created corporate version. Such a thing would give individual developers or organizations the choice to include their code in the tool, possibly for a fee if thatâs something they want or require. The creators of the tool would have to acknowledge that they have suppliersâthe people who create the code that makes their tool possibleâinstead of simply stealing what they need and pretending thatâs fine.
This era weâre living through, with large companies stomping over all laws and regulations, blatantly stealing other peopleâs work for their own profit, cannot come to an end soon enough. It is destroying innovation, and we all suffer for that. Having one nifty tool like CoPilot that gives a bit of convenience is nowhere near worth the tremendous loss that Microsoftâs actions in this instace are creating for everyone.
@carsten@yarn.zn80.net @lyse@lyse.isobeef.org I also think it is best called fake. Art is created by human beings, for human beings. It mediates a relationship between two people, and is a means of expression.
A computer has no inner life, no feelings, no experience of the world. It is not sentient. It has no life. Thereâs nothing âinâ there for it to express. Itâs just generating pixels in patterns weâve learned to recognize. These AI technologies are carefully crafted to fool people into experiencing the things they experience when they look at human-made art, but it is an empty experience.
@abucci@anthony.buc.ci that is an ironic example. Since the inventor of the seatbelt gave rights to use the technology freely.
On my blog: Commenting Code https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2023/03/05/comments.html #rant #technology
On my blog: Five Phases of AI Grief https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2023/02/26/ai-grief.html #rant #technology
On the blog: Amateur Stenography https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2021/11/28/steno.html #education #technology #opensource #typing
On the blog: Politics in Art and Technology https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2020/10/18/stories.html #politics #art #software #rant
On the blog: Free Culture Book Club â Where Are the Joneses? Part 4 https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2020/10/17/joneses4.html Politics in Art and Technology https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2020/10/18/stories.html #
Posted to Entropy Arbitrage: My Software https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2020/02/16/software.html #software #technology #meta
Posted to Entropy Arbitrage: Small Technology Notes https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2020/02/05/recutils.html #techtips #recutils #linux #sqlite #export
Posted to Entropy Arbitrage: Colagioia Industries https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2020/02/02/ci.html #software #technology #meta
Posted to Entropy Arbitrage: Small Technology Notes https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2020/01/29/tips.html #techtips #git #linux