Searching We.Love.Privacy.Club

Twts matching #twtxt.
Sort by: Newest, Oldest, Most Relevant
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)

@adi@f.adi.onl What about this one?

SRCFILES = $(wildcard *)
# remove existing *.gz (actually doubles entries)
CLEANSRC = $(SRCFILES:.gz=)
DSTFILES = $(addsuffix .gz, $(CLEANSRC))

%.gz: %
	gzip -c  $< > $<.gz

all: $(DSTFILES)

You must not have subdirectories in that folder, though.

⤋ Read More
meff
yarn.meff.me
 (4y ago)

@adi@f.adi.onl Ugh sorry for not replying. If the file list is dynamic, usually you use something like autoconf to generate the Makefile. I’ve also used wildcards in the past and that works okay. You should be able to use shell commands to populate the file list.

⤋ Read More
meff
yarn.meff.me
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » Ugh why does Emojipedia sell my data. This is so silly.

@prologic@twtxt.net Yeah like normally I’m just a little annoyed and just say “whatever” and shrug it off, but come on I am searching for emojis here. Do you really need to harvest my user data for what is essentially a fuzzy search in the Unicode table?

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Another feature request: sometimes I start writing a twt but then would like to discard it. It would be great if jeny could detect that I did not wrote (or saved) anything and then discards the twt instead of creating an "empty" one.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de I don’t by your example (rebasing behaviour), sorry.

Writing a twt is more similiar to writing a commit message. Git does quite some checks to detect that nothing new was written and happily discards a commit if you just leave the editor. You don’t need any special action, just quit your editor. Git will take care for the rest.

But it’s OK as it is. I just didn’t expect that I have to select and delete all to discard a twt. So it’s C-x h C-w C-x C-c for me.

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Another feature request: sometimes I start writing a twt but then would like to discard it. It would be great if jeny could detect that I did not wrote (or saved) anything and then discards the twt instead of creating an "empty" one.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Yes, this may be enough to check.

I only know this “feature” from my revision control software where I get “abort: empty Commit message” or “Aborting commit due to empty commit message” when I do not change whatever is already in there. Can be quite some text about which files changed and so on.

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Another feature request: sometimes I start writing a twt but then would like to discard it. It would be great if jeny could detect that I did not wrote (or saved) anything and then discards the twt instead of creating an "empty" one.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de My workflow is as follows.

I hit “reply” hotkey and my editor comes up.

With or without writing something I close my editor without saving the content.

Of course I close it by C-x C-c, not by :q! ;-)

Jenny finds the temp file unchanged, e.g. it’s content is the same as it was when my editor was started. I would like that jenny discards the reply then.

Autosaving is no problem either. Real editors do this to a temporary (kind of backup) file. Only in case of a crash that file is consulted and the user is asked if she would like to continue with that stored content.

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Today I had unexpected old twts after jenny -f. Have now jennys cache under revision control, automatically commiting changes after each fetch. Let's see if this helps finding a (possible) bug.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Your scenario would produce observed behaviour, agreed. On the other side I’m sure I’ve set very URL in lasttwt > 1630000000.0 (manually, in my editor).

But I can’t reproduce any weird behaviour right now. I’ve tried to “blackhole” twt.nfld.uk temporarily. That does not have any effect.

I’ve also tried to force twt.nfld.uk to deliver an empty twtxt. That does not have any effect either.

So I guess everything is fine with jenny.

I have wrapped jenny into some shell script to versionize ~/.cache/jenney. This way I have better data if anything unexprected is showing again.

⤋ Read More