Searching We Love Privacy Club

Twts matching #git
Sort by: Newest, Oldest, Most Relevant
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Another feature request: sometimes I start writing a twt but then would like to discard it. It would be great if jeny could detect that I did not wrote (or saved) anything and then discards the twt instead of creating an "empty" one.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de I don’t by your example (rebasing behaviour), sorry.

Writing a twt is more similiar to writing a commit message. Git does quite some checks to detect that nothing new was written and happily discards a commit if you just leave the editor. You don’t need any special action, just quit your editor. Git will take care for the rest.

But it’s OK as it is. I just didn’t expect that I have to select and delete all to discard a twt. So it’s C-x h C-w C-x C-c for me.

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » The original twt is unavailable. It may have been edited or deleted, or is from an unknown or muted feed.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de What do you think about this?

diff –git a/jenny b/jenny
index b47c78e..20cf659 100755
— a/jenny
+++ b/jenny
@@ -278,7 +278,8 @@ def prefill_for(email, reply_to_this, self_mentions):
def process_feed(config, nick, url, content, lasttwt):

 nick_address, nick_desc = decide_nick(content, nick)
 url_for_hash = decide_url_for_hash(content, url)

  • new_lasttwt = parse(‘1800-01-01T12:00:00+00:00’).timestamp()

  • # new_lasttwt = parse(‘1800-01-01T12:00:00+00:00’).timestamp()

  • new_lasttwt = None

    for line in twt_lines_from_content(content):

     res = twt_line_to_mail(

    @@ -296,7 +297,7 @@ def process_feed(config, nick, url, content, lasttwt):

     twt_stamp = twt_date.timestamp()
 if lasttwt is not None and lasttwt >= twt_stamp:
     continue

  • if twt_stamp > new_lasttwt:

  • if not new_lasttwt or twt_stamp > new_lasttwt:

         new_lasttwt = twt_stamp


 mailname_new = join(config['maildir_target'], 'new', twt_hash)

⤋ Read More
github_blog
feeds.twtxt.net
 (4y ago)

GitHub security update: revoking weakly-generated SSH keys
On September 28, 2021, we received notice from the developer Axosoft regarding a vulnerability in a dependency of their popular git GUI client - GitKraken. An underlying issue with a dependency, called `keypair`, resulted in the GitKraken client generating weak SSH keys. ⌘ Read more

⤋ Read More
github_blog
feeds.twtxt.net
 (5y ago)

GitHub Availability Report: August 2021
In August, we experienced two distinct incidents resulting in significant impact and degraded state of availability for Git operations, API requests, webhooks, issues, pull requests, GitHub Pages, GitHub Packages, and GitHub Actions services. ⌘ Read more

⤋ Read More
github_blog
feeds.twtxt.net
 (5y ago)

Improving Git protocol security on GitHub
We’re changing which keys are supported in SSH and removing unencrypted Git protocol. Only users connecting via SSH or git:// will be affected. If your Git remotes start with https://, nothing in this post will affect you. If you’re an SSH user, read on for the details and timeline. ⌘ Read more

⤋ Read More
xuu
txt.sour.is
 (5y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » The original twt is unavailable. It may have been edited or deleted, or is from an unknown or muted feed.

@prologic@twtxt.net @jlj@twt.nfld.uk @movq@www.uninformativ.de

 /p/tmp > git clone https://www.uninformativ.de/git/lariza.git                                                                                                    Mon May 24 23:48:18 2021
Cloning into 'lariza'...
 /p/tmp > tree lariza/                                                                                                                                    12.5s  Mon May 24 23:48:32 2021
lariza/
├── BUGS
├── CHANGES
├── LICENSE
├── Makefile
├── PATCHES
├── README
├── browser.c
├── man1
│   ├── lariza.1
│   └── lariza.usage.1
├── user-scripts
│   └── hints.js
└── we_adblock.c

2 directories, 11 files

⤋ Read More