🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:657 ARCHIVED:124059 CACHE:8773 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:233 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:56550 CACHE:2066 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:233 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:56550 CACHE:2066 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:651 ARCHIVED:123454 CACHE:6499 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:232 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:56318 CACHE:2033 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:232 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:56318 CACHE:2033 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44582 ARCHIVED:122836 CACHE:10043 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:231 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:56056 CACHE:2038 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:231 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:56056 CACHE:2038 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44581 ARCHIVED:122474 CACHE:9991 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
@movq@www.uninformativ.de My workflow is as follows.
I hit “reply” hotkey and my editor comes up.
With or without writing something I close my editor without saving the content.
Of course I close it by C-x C-c, not by :q! ;-)
Jenny finds the temp file unchanged, e.g. it’s content is the same as it was when my editor was started. I would like that jenny discards the reply then.
Autosaving is no problem either. Real editors do this to a temporary (kind of backup) file. Only in case of a crash that file is consulted and the user is asked if she would like to continue with that stored content.
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:230 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:55821 CACHE:2086 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:230 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:55821 CACHE:2086 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44580 ARCHIVED:122069 CACHE:11727 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:229 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:55620 CACHE:2133 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:229 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:55620 CACHE:2133 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44578 ARCHIVED:120748 CACHE:10544 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:228 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:55428 CACHE:2134 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:228 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:55428 CACHE:2134 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44574 ARCHIVED:120245 CACHE:6137 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:227 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:55228 CACHE:2173 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:227 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:55228 CACHE:2173 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44571 ARCHIVED:117826 CACHE:19109 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
@prologic@twtxt.net I’ve deleted eleven and utf8test, https://search.twtxt.net is the only follower. Maybe you can stop it to follow those twtxts? They were meant for testing purposes only.
Building the next phase of GitHub, together
This morning, I shared the following post with Hubbers in response to Nat’s announcement about his next adventure. I am thrilled to take on the role of CEO to build the next phase of GitHub for our global community of software developers. ⌘ Read more
Thank you, GitHub
This morning, I sent the following post to the GitHub team. TL;DR: I’m moving on to my next adventure, and Thomas Dohmke (currently Chief Product Officer) will be GitHub’s next CEO. ⌘ Read more
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:226 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54944 CACHE:2124 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:226 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54944 CACHE:2124 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44569 ARCHIVED:115777 CACHE:17622 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:225 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54681 CACHE:2086 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:225 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54681 CACHE:2086 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44562 ARCHIVED:113664 CACHE:14484 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:45
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:224 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54447 CACHE:2059 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:224 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54447 CACHE:2059 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44561 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:108163 CACHE:15398 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:223 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54236 CACHE:2108 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:223 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54236 CACHE:2108 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44560 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:107759 CACHE:15365 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
@prologic@twtxt.net @movq@www.uninformativ.de
Exactly, you see correct UTF-8 encoded version (even with content-type: text/plain leaving out charset declaration).
After following utf8test twtxt myself I now see that jenny does not handle it as UTF-8 when charset is missing from HTTP header, just like @quark@ferengi.one has observed.
So should jenny treat twtxt files always as UTF-8 encoded? I’m not sure about this.
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:222 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54048 CACHE:2122 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:222 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:54048 CACHE:2122 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44559 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:107383 CACHE:15350 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
My thoughts about pagination (paging)
Following the discussion about pagination (paging) I think that’s the right thing to do.
Fetching the same content again and again with only a marginal portion of actually new twts is unbearable and does not scale in any way. It’s not only a waste of bandwidth but with increasing number of fetchers it will also become a problem for pods to serve all requests.
Because it’s so easy to implement and simple to understand, splitting twtxt file in parts with next and prev pointers seems a really amazing solution.
As in RFC5005 there should also be a meta header pointing to the main URL, e.g. current or baseurl or something like that. This way hashes can calculated correctly even for archived twts.
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:221 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:53815 CACHE:2111 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:221 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:53815 CACHE:2111 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44558 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:106992 CACHE:15325 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:220 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:53495 CACHE:2116 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:220 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:53495 CACHE:2116 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44557 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:106371 CACHE:15079 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
Ignite Realtime Blog: Push Notification Openfire plugin 0.9.0 released
I’m happy to be able to announce that we’ve released version 0.9.0 of the Push Notifications plugin for Openfire!
This version does not bring new functionality. It does fix a bug that older versions of this plugin had, when running on Openfire 4.6.4 or later.
For other release announcements and news follow us on Twitter
1 post - 1 participant
�� … ⌘ Read more
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:219 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:53234 CACHE:2064 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:219 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:53234 CACHE:2064 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44555 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:106018 CACHE:14922 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:218 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:52943 CACHE:2028 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:218 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:52943 CACHE:2028 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44554 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:105912 CACHE:14907 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
D~d>1m and then fetched by !jenny -f. This brings back all deleted twts. Isn't lastmods used to skip older twts?
I’m curious, what is your use case for deleting twts?
Not just deleting, also sorting into other folders is impossible.
It also doesn’t scale in the long term. When I cannot delete twts then I have a full copy of every twtxt I follow - forever. That’s a waste of bandwidth and disk space.
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:217 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:52648 CACHE:2015 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:217 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:52648 CACHE:2015 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44553 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:105763 CACHE:14865 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:216 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:52412 CACHE:2110 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:216 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:52412 CACHE:2110 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44552 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:105647 CACHE:14845 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:215 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:52195 CACHE:2122 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:215 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:52195 CACHE:2122 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44551 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:105499 CACHE:14827 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:214 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:51989 CACHE:2112 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23
**
🧮 USERS:3 FEEDS:6 TWTS:214 BLOGS:0 ARCHIVED:51989 CACHE:2112 FOLLOWERS:7 FOLLOWING:23 ⌘ Read more
🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44550 BLOGS:3 ARCHIVED:105434 CACHE:14813 FOLLOWERS:23 FOLLOWING:44
@prologic@twtxt.net
Kind of a pickle. I would say, if the user isn’t following the feed, then @something and @something@example.com doesn’t get linked.