@prologic@twtxt.net There are a lot of logs being generated by yarnd, which is something I havenāt seen before too:
Jul 25 14:32:42 buc yarnd[1911318]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 14:32:42 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/ubhq33a HTTP/1.1" 404 29 643.251µs
Jul 25 14:32:43 buc yarnd[1911318]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 14:32:43 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/112073211746755451 HTTP/1.1" 400 12 505.333µs
Jul 25 14:32:44 buc yarnd[1911318]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 14:32:44 (111.119.213.103) "GET /twt/whau6pa HTTP/1.1" 200 37360 35.173255ms
Jul 25 14:32:44 buc yarnd[1911318]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 14:32:44 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/112343305123858004 HTTP/1.1" 400 12 455.069µs
Jul 25 14:32:44 buc yarnd[1911318]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 14:32:44 (168.199.225.19) "GET /external?nick=lovetocode999&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.palapa.pl%2Fbaners.php%3Flink%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.dwnewstoday.com HTTP/1.1" 200 36167 19.582077ms
Jul 25 14:32:44 buc yarnd[1911318]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 14:32:44 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/112503061785024494 HTTP/1.1" 400 12 619.152µs
Jul 25 14:32:46 buc yarnd[1911318]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 14:32:46 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/111863876118553837 HTTP/1.1" 400 12 817.678µs
Jul 25 14:32:46 buc yarnd[1911318]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 14:32:46 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/112749994821704400 HTTP/1.1" 400 12 540.616µs
Jul 25 14:32:47 buc yarnd[1911318]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 14:32:47 (103.204.109.150) "GET /external?nick=lovetocode999&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fampurify.com%2Fbbs%2Fboard.php%3Fbo_table%3Dfree%26wr_id%3D113858 HTTP/1.1" 200 36187 15.95329ms
Iāve seen that nick=lovetocode999 a bunch.
There are also a bunch of log messages scrolling by. Iāve never seen this much activity in the log:
Jul 25 01:37:39 buc.ci yarnd[829]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 01:37:39 (149.71.56.69) "GET /external?nick=lovetocode999&uri=https://pagez.co.uk/services/your-own-100-fully-owned-online-vi>
Jul 25 01:37:39 buc.ci yarnd[829]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 01:37:39 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/112135496802692324 HTTP/1.1" 400 12 826.65µs
Jul 25 01:37:40 buc.ci yarnd[829]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 01:37:40 (51.222.253.14) "GET /conv/muttriq HTTP/1.1" 200 36881 20.448309ms
Jul 25 01:37:40 buc.ci yarnd[829]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 01:37:40 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/112730114943543514 HTTP/1.1" 400 12 663.493µs
Jul 25 01:37:40 buc.ci yarnd[829]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 01:37:40 (27.75.213.253) "GET /external?nick=lovetocode999&uri=http%3A%2F%2Falfarah.jo%2FHome%2FChangeCulture%3FlangCode%3Den>
Jul 25 01:37:40 buc.ci yarnd[829]: time="2024-07-25T01:37:40Z" level=error msg="http://bynet.com.br/log_envio.asp?cod=335&email=%21%2AEMAIL%2A%21&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.almanacar.c>
Jul 25 01:37:40 buc.ci yarnd[829]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 01:37:40 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/111674756400660911 HTTP/1.1" 400 12 545.106µs
Jul 25 01:37:40 buc.ci yarnd[829]: time="2024-07-25T01:37:40Z" level=warning msg="feed FetchFeedRequest: @<lovetocode999 http://alfarah.jo/Home/ChangeCulture?langCode=en&returnUrl>
Jul 25 01:37:41 buc.ci yarnd[829]: [yarnd] 2024/07/25 01:37:41 (162.211.155.2) "GET /twt/112507964696096567 HTTP/1.1" 400 12 838.946µs
Something really weird is going on?
The delete twt is not working.
So updated. Seems to duplicate here in the ui. And what is this āRead Moreā on every twt now?
Testing something.. can someone mention me in a twt?
It not that easy @xuu@txt.sour.is since I implemented webmentions in a different way that how it have been done in yarnd to work with txt-files. You can find the code in webmention_endpoint.php and new_twt.php at main Ā· sorenpeter/timeline
@shreyan@twtxt.net What do you mean when you say federation protocol?
Either use webfinger for identity like mastodon etc. or use ATproto from Bluesky (or both?)
We can use webmentions or create our own twt-mentions for notifying someones feed (WIP code at: https://github.com/sorenpeter/timeline/tree/webmention/views)
Iām not sure we need much else. I would not even bother with encryption since other platforms does that better, and for me twtxt/yarn/timeline is for making things public
Twtxt spec enhancement proposal thread š§µ
Adding attributes to individual twts similar to adding feed attributes in the heading comments.
https://git.mills.io/yarnsocial/go-lextwt/pulls/17
The basic use case would be for multilingual feeds where there is a default language and some twts will be written a different language.
As seen in the wild: https://eapl.mx/twtxt.txt
The attributes are formatted as [key=value]
They can show up in the twt anywhere it is not enclosed by another element such as codeblock or part of a markdown link.
> ?
@sorenpeter@darch.dk this makes sense as a quote twt that references a direct URL. If we go back to how it developed on twitter originally it was RT @nick: original text because it contained the original text the twitter algorithm would boost that text into trending.
i like the format (#hash) @<nick url> > "Quoted text"\nThen a comment
as it preserves the human read able. and has the hash for linking to the yarn. The comment part could be optional for just boosting the twt.
The only issue i think i would have would be that that yarn could then become a mess of repeated quotes. Unless the client knows to interpret them as multiple users have reposted/boosted the thread.
The format is also how iphone does reactions to SMS messages with +number liked: original SMS
> ?
@eapl.me@eapl.me this is interesting. Is the square bracket something used in the wild for multilingual twts?
@prologic@twtxt.net what are your thoughts? Should we extend the parser to handle [lang] and [boost] ? Or a generic attribute spec. Single word is a boolean attribute. And one with an = is a string key/value.
@prologic@twtxt.net I do, but you didnāt specify in your twt that you needed to use a github account. I copy pasted the ssh command you posted verbatim!
Letās assume for a moment that an answer to a question would be met with so many words you donāt know what the answer was at all. Why? Why do this? Is this a stereotype of academics and philosophers? If so, itās not a very straight-forward way of thinking, let alone answering a simple question.
Well, I canāt know whatās in these peoplesā minds and hearts. Personally I think itās a way of dissembling, of sowing doubt, and of maintaining plausible deniability. The strategy is to persuade as many people as possible to change their minds, and then force the remaining people to accept the idea because they think too many other people believe it.
Letās say you want, for whatever reason, to get a lot of people to accept an idea that you know most people find horrible. The last thing you should do is express the idea clearly and concisely and repeat it over and over again. All youād accomplish is to cement peopleās resistance to you, and label yourself as a person who harbors horrible ideas that they donāt like. So you canāt do that.
What do you do instead? The entire field of ārhetoricā, dating back at least to Plato and Aristotle (400 years BC), is all about this. How to persuade people to accept your idea, even when they resist it. There are way too many techniques to summarize in a twt, but it seems almost obvious that you have to use more words and to use misleading or at least embellished or warped descriptions of things, because thatās the opposite of clearly and concisely expressing yourself, which would directly lead to people rejecting your idea.
Thatās how I think of it anyway.
@prologic@twtxt.net I would politely suggest again that we not react to people with bad attitudes who talk shit about yarn. If twt is forked, it should be forked to add features that are otherwise not possible. Not to appease people who will probably never be appeased.
Iām not super a fan of using json. I feel we could still use text as the medium. Maybe a modified version to fix any weakness.
What if instead of signing each twt individually we generated a merkle tree using the twt hashes? Then a signature of the root hash. This would ensure the full stream of twts are intact with a minimal overhead. With the added bonus of helping clients identify missing twts when syncing/gossiping.
Have two endpoints. One as the webfinger to link profile details and avatar like you posted. And the signature for the merkleroot twt. And the other a pageable stream of twts. Or individual twts/merkle branch to incrementally access twt feeds.
it could have been some with running out of disk space for my twt cache.
@mckinley@twtxt.net very weird things going on for me.. i can see your twt but its not showing up as a reply or fork? 
i am curious why I only get 5 twts in yarn when they have several more on the feed. so something isnt parsing right.
Did something chchange with how the discover feed is generated? My pods logout mode now only shows my twts. It used to be all twts from watcher observation like my logged on discover tab. @prologic@twtxt.net
I am offended that you did not post your snarky twt.
for some reason its showing the twt from 2 days ago instead of the current value
@novaburst@twt.nfld.uk Ah.. that is probably the XMPP verify code.. it doesnt really work that well. I aught to take it out.
@novaburst@twt.nfld.uk what is it?
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Excellent use of old denim, and also excellent use of long-form twt!
I think i would like a display mode that sorts yarns by last twt in yarn and displays only the last twt with the first in the heading if its more than one in length.
@novaburst@twt.nfld.uk I doubt there will ever be a 2.0 ⦠It may end up like java and they strip off the 1.
@screem@yarn.yarnpods.com yah I finally saw all of Daveās twts and figured he had explained Gogās/gitea better.
@benk@kwiecien.us I am using jenny (we chatted a bit on IRC earlier today). I have been using it for over five months now, I think. It is truly a joy to use, specially because you can use the power of Mutt/NeoMutt to read your twts.
@movq@www.uninformativ.de was the request to remove the hash (subject) from showing on twts discarded? I donāt see it on the TODO, so I am curious. Was it something you decided was not worth investing time on?
@prologic@twtxt.net I am seeing a problem in which not-so-active users, such as myself, are ending up having a blank āRecent twts fromā¦ā under their profiles because, I assume, the cache long expired. What can be done about it? Business personalities such as myself canāt be around here that often! Could something be implemented so that, say, the last 10 or 20 twts are always visible under oneās profile? Neep-gren!
@fastidious@arrakis.netbros.com +1 ā¦Now just a way to come up with the $20 per twt to store the data.
An ageing rose cries. My first graphical media twt!
@movq@www.uninformativ.de, is removing the hash from the body of the twt on the TODO? I read it, but I am unsure if it is there already, or not. š Sorry if it is, and I failed to spot it!
@movq@www.uninformativ.de i believe the delete of any twt was a tech limitation with retwt parser not knowing where in the file a twt came from. lextwt tracks the bytes in file where a twt was read from. which could be used to delete a twt from file.. in theory.
I am in the camp of wishing i could delete arbitrary twts.
@darch@twtxt.net
Getting this when trying to use it:
error executing template timeline: template: timeline:131:43: executing "twt" at <formatForDateTime>: wrong number of args for formatForDateTime: want 2 got 1
I think something has caused my feed to be in a bad state and is now unpardableš„
I can read this on jenny, but the twt isnāt making it to my own pod. Something has gone really wrong, me thinks.
@prologic@twtxt.net Its not FormatText stripping out the lines. That formats with \n newlines so when unmarshalling it tries to parse the text and sees that as the end of twt. LiteralText keeps the newlines as \u2028
@prologic@twtxt.net make the text field twt.LiteralText() instead of twt.FormatText() and you should be good. https://i.imgur.com/FIpSnkj.png
multi.
line.
twt..
multi
line
twt
@fastidious@arrakis.netbros.com will reply to this twt, quoting something in it. I will do that same afterwards on his reply.
@jlj@twt.nfld.uk
Yup, jenny. She is so cool! š
@movq@www.uninformativ.de
Yes, I did ask whether or not it was possible to move twts to an āarchiveā folder, but it will be the same at @stackeffect@twtxt.stackeffect.de experienced (which I have, too), that is, twts will ācome backā.
There is no clear solution, I am afraid, right? It is the nature of the beast.
@movq@www.uninformativ.de
Aha! Cool! Not just deleting, but proceeding as if the twt is going to be send. If I :q! on vi it will add an empty line. If, instead, I go :x like I normally do, it works as you saidāand as I wanted it. Thanks!
@movq@www.uninformativ.de OK, I am on request/question asking mode today. š How do you cancel a twt, or a reply to a twt? Say I hit my reply, and then I change my mind? Right now, even exiting vi is creating an empty line on my twtxt.txt. Is there an obvious way to cancel a twt, reply, or fork that I am missing?
If
Subjectcontains the full twt, then you can skim over conversations just by reading those lines in muttās index pager
Yes, I do the same, true.
So I decided: Okay, letās have mutt do it.
And Mutt does it well. I agree it was/is a good idea.
The subject lines are already ācompressedā
I noticed, yes.
I am not sure why I asked to begin with; in retrospect, in was a silly request. Perhaps the OCD in me got triggered while viewing rich headers, on a specific twt, when I saw the huge subject line that is, otherwise, always hidden.
Anyway, donāt mind me, move along. š
@prologic@twtxt.net
Jenny populates Muttās subject with the entire twt. That makes for very, very long subject lines.
@stackeffect@twtxt.stackeffect.de
I am seeing this characters on your twts: )?Ć¢\200ĀØĆ¢\200ĀØ. Which client are you using?
@stigatle@twtxt.net
A twtxt client would be nice! Or a very simple cgi script to print twts to web nicelyānot a second Yarn, just something to show twts in a pretty form on the web.
@movq@www.uninformativ.de
Fair enough, I will modify my cron job to match. When I come across edited twts, I just delete both knowing jenny will fetch the right one next iteration. I like keeping things tidy. š