🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44234 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:66166 CACHE:9314 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:42

@jlj@twt.nfld.uk “Anyone running Urbit? Thinking about having a play with a comet. ☄🌒” -> Just as @movq@www.uninformativ.de has problems with his reading queue, I have problems with my “things to explore” queue. I even bought a planet a while back, but haven’t had time to dive into the extradimensional madness of the urbit system. Subjective impressions & reviews highly anticipated!

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44232 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:65627 CACHE:8923 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:41

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44230 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:65256 CACHE:8725 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:41

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44229 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:64667 CACHE:8648 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:41

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44228 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:63957 CACHE:6346 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:40

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44225 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:63578 CACHE:6140 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:40

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44223 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:63159 CACHE:5702 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:39

@jlj@twt.nfld.uk “@niplav (#4qeibma) Hadn’t heard of this; thanks for the tip! Been getting lost in your text reviews; the Benatar piece piqued my interest: I’d been reading a critique of his earlier work – in Overall’s Why Have Children? – that really wasn’t up to scratch. Now I’m reading about pure replicators, which is a new concept, to me. :-)” -> Nice :-) Looking over my text reviews, they’re not quite finished (especially the Benatar one), so take it with a grain of salt

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44218 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:62774 CACHE:8906 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:39

@prologic@twtxt.net we would want:

• a way to reply to the current thread. We have this.
  
• a way to reply to a specific twt. Need this. Maybe make all the replies start new conversations?
  
• check if twt is start of a conversation.. we kinda have this in the main feed with the conversation button. need to extend it for forked convs
  
• a way to inline first replies. maybe show one or two in the sub thread with a link to view.
  
• for convenience have a link to parent conv?

@prologic@twtxt.net speaking of complexity.. How would checking twts for sub conversations complexify things?

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44193 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:62414 CACHE:7795 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:39

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44225 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:62049 CACHE:8892 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:39

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44223 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:61704 CACHE:8840 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:39

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44221 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:61358 CACHE:8807 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:39

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44220 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:61118 CACHE:8737 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:39

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44218 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:61014 CACHE:8706 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:39

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44217 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:60883 CACHE:8647 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:38

@prologic@twtxt.net @jlj@twt.nfld.uk @thewismit@twtxt.psynergy.io https://gist.github.com/JonLundy/fb2a23c003be46c3a66e4b14e5971f13

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44215 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:60780 CACHE:8615 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:38

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44214 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:60086 CACHE:5122 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:38

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44210 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:59522 CACHE:8795 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:38

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44209 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:59399 CACHE:8754 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:38

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44207 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:59284 CACHE:8714 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:37

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44205 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:59134 CACHE:8694 FOLLOWERS:12 FOLLOWING:37

@xuu@txt.sour.is @jlj@twt.nfld.uk @hxii@0xff.nu only if you look at the raw text file https://0xff.nu/blog.txt

@jlj@twt.nfld.uk oh dang the reply didnt add the reply. It was to @hxii@0xff.nu because Firefox shows his shruggy like ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44198 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:59002 CACHE:8650 FOLLOWERS:11 FOLLOWING:37

@jlj@twt.nfld.uk “Wow. I think much of what drew me to zettlekasten – and then letting it languish :-( – really belongs in Anki.” i have only used SRS for ~3 months now, so I’m not sure how long i’ll continue

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44197 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:58669 CACHE:8616 FOLLOWERS:11 FOLLOWING:37

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44194 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:57838 CACHE:8303 FOLLOWERS:11 FOLLOWING:35

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44192 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:53395 CACHE:5105 FOLLOWERS:11 FOLLOWING:35

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44190 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:50573 CACHE:4757 FOLLOWERS:11 FOLLOWING:34

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:44184 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:3150 CACHE:4999 FOLLOWERS:11 FOLLOWING:32

308 Permanent Redirect; Location: http://twt.nfld.uk/user/jlj/twtxt.txt

308 Permanent Redirect; Location: http://twt.nfld.uk/user/jlj/twtxt.txt

Hoping this will be my last twt from this Ctrl-C Club locale; my pod is up & running at twt.nfld.uk. :-) Planning to migrate this week!

Hoping this will be my last twt from this Ctrl-C Club locale; my pod is up & running at twt.nfld.uk. :-) Planning to migrate this week!

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:250 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:3125 CACHE:4970 FOLLOWERS:11 FOLLOWING:32

FOLLOW: @xuu@txt.sour.is from @alice@twt.nfld.uk using twtxt/0.1.0@0f0603f

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:322 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:3103 CACHE:4921 FOLLOWERS:10 FOLLOWING:31

@prologic@twtxt.net @thewismit@blog.thewismit.com (#nicbdoq) possible, or a pod following any feeds it finds, if any one follows or not. So it has more twts cached

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:293 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:2979 CACHE:4449 FOLLOWERS:10 FOLLOWING:31

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:241 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:23341 CACHE:9805 FOLLOWERS:9 FOLLOWING:31

@prologic @darch Thank you for making twt.social etc:) I don’t think I have been this involed in a open source project before.

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:229 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:23273 CACHE:9774 FOLLOWERS:9 FOLLOWING:31

@prologic@twtxt.net that would be an interesting idea. I think your current spec of using an SMTP proto is probably best for DM.

but having a federation of IRC servers would be interesting for realtime twt propagation.

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:223 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:23273 CACHE:9748 FOLLOWERS:8 FOLLOWING:31

🧮 USERS:1 FEEDS:6 TWTS:222 BLOGS:1 ARCHIVED:23273 CACHE:9683 FOLLOWERS:8 FOLLOWING:31