Searching We.Love.Privacy.Club

Twts matching #twtxt.
Sort by: Newest, Oldest, Most Relevant
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)

@adi@f.adi.onl What about this one?

SRCFILES = $(wildcard *)
# remove existing *.gz (actually doubles entries)
CLEANSRC = $(SRCFILES:.gz=)
DSTFILES = $(addsuffix .gz, $(CLEANSRC))

%.gz: %
	gzip -c  $< > $<.gz

all: $(DSTFILES)

You must not have subdirectories in that folder, though.

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Another feature request: sometimes I start writing a twt but then would like to discard it. It would be great if jeny could detect that I did not wrote (or saved) anything and then discards the twt instead of creating an "empty" one.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de I don’t by your example (rebasing behaviour), sorry.

Writing a twt is more similiar to writing a commit message. Git does quite some checks to detect that nothing new was written and happily discards a commit if you just leave the editor. You don’t need any special action, just quit your editor. Git will take care for the rest.

But it’s OK as it is. I just didn’t expect that I have to select and delete all to discard a twt. So it’s C-x h C-w C-x C-c for me.

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Another feature request: sometimes I start writing a twt but then would like to discard it. It would be great if jeny could detect that I did not wrote (or saved) anything and then discards the twt instead of creating an "empty" one.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Yes, this may be enough to check.

I only know this “feature” from my revision control software where I get “abort: empty Commit message” or “Aborting commit due to empty commit message” when I do not change whatever is already in there. Can be quite some text about which files changed and so on.

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Another feature request: sometimes I start writing a twt but then would like to discard it. It would be great if jeny could detect that I did not wrote (or saved) anything and then discards the twt instead of creating an "empty" one.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de My workflow is as follows.

I hit “reply” hotkey and my editor comes up.

With or without writing something I close my editor without saving the content.

Of course I close it by C-x C-c, not by :q! ;-)

Jenny finds the temp file unchanged, e.g. it’s content is the same as it was when my editor was started. I would like that jenny discards the reply then.

Autosaving is no problem either. Real editors do this to a temporary (kind of backup) file. Only in case of a crash that file is consulted and the user is asked if she would like to continue with that stored content.

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Today I had unexpected old twts after jenny -f. Have now jennys cache under revision control, automatically commiting changes after each fetch. Let's see if this helps finding a (possible) bug.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Your scenario would produce observed behaviour, agreed. On the other side I’m sure I’ve set very URL in lasttwt > 1630000000.0 (manually, in my editor).

But I can’t reproduce any weird behaviour right now. I’ve tried to “blackhole” twt.nfld.uk temporarily. That does not have any effect.

I’ve also tried to force twt.nfld.uk to deliver an empty twtxt. That does not have any effect either.

So I guess everything is fine with jenny.

I have wrapped jenny into some shell script to versionize ~/.cache/jenney. This way I have better data if anything unexprected is showing again.

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » @movq Today I had unexpected old twts after jenny -f. Have now jennys cache under revision control, automatically commiting changes after each fetch. Let's see if this helps finding a (possible) bug.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Yes, it was exactly those twts. I don’t think I’ve managed to “match” the downtime while fetching twts. But even if I had, how can this lead to inserting old twts?

⤋ Read More
stackeffect
twtxt.stackeffect.de
 (4y ago)

@movq@www.uninformativ.de What do you think about this?

diff –git a/jenny b/jenny
index b47c78e..20cf659 100755
— a/jenny
+++ b/jenny
@@ -278,7 +278,8 @@ def prefill_for(email, reply_to_this, self_mentions):
def process_feed(config, nick, url, content, lasttwt):

 nick_address, nick_desc = decide_nick(content, nick)
 url_for_hash = decide_url_for_hash(content, url)

  • new_lasttwt = parse(‘1800-01-01T12:00:00+00:00’).timestamp()

  • # new_lasttwt = parse(‘1800-01-01T12:00:00+00:00’).timestamp()

  • new_lasttwt = None

    for line in twt_lines_from_content(content):

     res = twt_line_to_mail(

    @@ -296,7 +297,7 @@ def process_feed(config, nick, url, content, lasttwt):

     twt_stamp = twt_date.timestamp()
 if lasttwt is not None and lasttwt >= twt_stamp:
     continue

  • if twt_stamp > new_lasttwt:

  • if not new_lasttwt or twt_stamp > new_lasttwt:

         new_lasttwt = twt_stamp


 mailname_new = join(config['maildir_target'], 'new', twt_hash)

⤋ Read More