Hell yeah, this is some amazing bee stuff! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgOYLDf5Wv8
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Classically navigating through the history still works perfectly fine on most (if not all) websites I visit.
@prologic@twtxt.net @movq@www.uninformativ.de @bender@twtxt.net Yup, I second that. :-) We went to Ebersberg Castle with the scouts. It was great fun and very exhausting at the same time.
All packed, ready to go.
@mckinley@mckinley.cc That’s a cool idea!
twtxt.net
), I'm going to be deleting 235 accounts today: https://gist.mills.io/prologic/0381c79977384051bb0b4afc89b4893d
@prologic@twtxt.net I noted it in my calendar, looking forward to it. :-)
yarnd setup
look like to anyone? 🤔 Let's say it exists, and it helps you setup a Yarn pod in seconds. What does it do? Of course I'd have to split out yarnd
itself into yarnd run
to actually run the server/daemon part.
@prologic@twtxt.net Cool!
@movq@www.uninformativ.de I’m subscribed to 48 feeds at the moment. And only a fraction is actually active.
yarnd setup
look like to anyone? 🤔 Let's say it exists, and it helps you setup a Yarn pod in seconds. What does it do? Of course I'd have to split out yarnd
itself into yarnd run
to actually run the server/daemon part.
@prologic@twtxt.net Oh, was I? I don’t recall any of that. But who knows. ;-)
@prologic@twtxt.net I won’t see any activity again, unless somebody else I follow interacts with them. Yep, fetching the feeds still happens with a patched version of the original twtxt client. tt is just a viewer of the database contents.
Righto, it’s time for a rotation into archive feeds again.
I just cleared my following list. Kicked out all the 26Â feeds that have not been updated for two years or more. This will reduce a bit of useless traffic.
twtxt.net
), I'm going to be deleting 235 accounts today: https://gist.mills.io/prologic/0381c79977384051bb0b4afc89b4893d
@prologic@twtxt.net I figured, yep.
yarnd setup
look like to anyone? 🤔 Let's say it exists, and it helps you setup a Yarn pod in seconds. What does it do? Of course I'd have to split out yarnd
itself into yarnd run
to actually run the server/daemon part.
@prologic@twtxt.net Does one need a build timestamp anyway? That’s an enemy to reproducible builds. Maybe just use the commit timestamp? That would work at least for official releases. It would be off for dirty working directories during development, though: git show -s --pretty=format:%cI
wc -l .zsh_history
gives me 7100. That's surprisingly a bit more than I thought. I used to regularly clear new stuff by hand and keep important commands to about twenty-something. I don't recall the numbers anymore.
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Yeah, I did.
twtxt.net
), I'm going to be deleting 235 accounts today: https://gist.mills.io/prologic/0381c79977384051bb0b4afc89b4893d
@prologic@twtxt.net Oh wow, still so many left. Cool.
mentions:prologic@twtxt.net
for example. I hope this makes the useability much better đź‘Ś
@prologic@twtxt.net Looks much better, although I’d strip the “v” prefix in yarns’ “v$branch@$hash”.
mentions:prologic@twtxt.net
for example. I hope this makes the useability much better đź‘Ś
@prologic@twtxt.net Nice!
Btw. the versions in the search.twtxt.net and twtxt.net footers are both a bit wonky now. 8-)
twtxt.net
), I'm going to be deleting 235 accounts today: https://gist.mills.io/prologic/0381c79977384051bb0b4afc89b4893d
@prologic@twtxt.net FWIW, at least five feeds were not empty. But their feeds still looked dead, since the last posts were from 2020 and 2021. So that was probably before the date of last login was recorded.
Btw. how many accounts are there currently on twtxt.net? https://twtxt.net/user/stats/twtxt.txt looks like a grave, too. :-D
@movq@www.uninformativ.de wc -l .zsh_history
gives me 7100. That’s surprisingly a bit more than I thought. I used to regularly clear new stuff by hand and keep important commands to about twenty-something. I don’t recall the numbers anymore.
@bender@twtxt.net In the end the cameraperson overtakes him again. But yeah, who knows with today’s AI crap everywhere.
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Yep, I use it all the time, too. Except for Go, where I use Ctrl+x+o for Go-specific completion. But Ctrl+n still comes in very handy for strings and the like. In fact, it scans all the open buffers for completion suggestions.
Quite the acrobatic piece: https://youtu.be/p5GU_BvvHso