Won a bunch of games of Solitaire and then rearranged the cards for maximum negative points, to distract me from the horrors.
(Still ended up with >0 points on OS/2, because donât ask me.)
https://www.uninformativ.de/desktop/2025%2D11%2D04%2D%2Dkatriawm%2Dsolitaire.png
@dce@hashnix.club Nope. đ Whatâs that genre called? Sounds like old horror movies from the 70âies (or it could be a soundtrack to Salad Fingers, if anyone remembers that).
In 1996, they came up with the X11 âSECURITYâ extension:
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/4w548u/what_is_up_with_the_x11_security_extension/
This is what could have (eventually) solved the security issues that weâre currently seeing with X11. Those issues are cited as one of the reasons for switching to Wayland.
That extension never took off. The person on reddit wonders why â I think itâs simple: Containers and sandboxes werenât a thing in 1996. It hardly mattered if X11 was âinsecureâ. If you could run an X11 client, you probably already had access to the machine and could just do all kinds of other nasty things.
Today, sandboxing is a thing. Today, this matters.
Iâve heard so many times that âX11 is beyond fixable, itâs hopeless.â I donât believe that. I believe that these problems are solveable with X11 and some devs have said âyeah, we could have kept working on itâ. Itâs that people donât want to do it:
Why not extend the X server?
Because for the first time we have a realistic chance of not having to do that.
https://wayland.freedesktop.org/faq.html
Iâm not in a position to judge the devs. Maybe the X.Org code really is so bad that you want to run away, screaming in horror. I donât know.
But all this was a choice. I donât buy the argument that we never would have gotten rid of things like core fonts.
All the toolkits and programs had to be ported to Wayland. A huge, still unfinished effort. If that was an acceptable thing to do, then it would have been acceptable to make an âX12â that keeps all the good things about X11, remains compatible where feasible, eliminates the problems, and requires some clients to be adjusted. (You could have still made âX11X12â like âXWaylandâ for actual legacy programs.)
Recent #fiction #scifi #reading:
The Memory Police by YĹko Ogawa. Lovely writing. Very understated; reminded me of Kazuo Ishiguro. Sort of like Nineteen Eighty-Four but not. (I first heard it recommended in comparison to that work.)
Subcutanean by Aaron Reed; https://subcutanean.textories.com/ . Every copy of the book is different, which is a cool idea. I read two of them (one from the library, actually not different from the other printed copies, and one personalized e-book). I donât read much horror so managed to be a little creeped out by it, which was fun.
The Wind from Nowhere, a 1962 novel by J. G. Ballard. A random pick from the sci-fi section; I think I picked it up because it made me imagine some weird 4-dimensional effect (âfrom nowhereâ meaning not in a normal direction) but actually (spoiler) it was just about a lot of wind for no reason. The book was moderately entertaining but there was nothing special about it.
Currently reading Scale by Greg Egan and Inversion by Aric McBay.
@fastidious@arrakis.netbros.com the things Gemini has going for it are mutual TLS and lack of JavaScript. Which makes for a secure albeit boring experience (much like gopher). The fake markdown is a bit of a drag.
A render mode for Gemini probably wouldnt be too hard. There are markdown to Gemini libs out there.
With Web3 the whole trust a 3rd party browser ext + high fees + env impact for compute and storage are serious no gos for me.. I have heard one too many horror stories about clicking the wrong link and some script draining your metamask wallet.
On the blog: Short Fiction â The Gevkahahal https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2021/10/31/gevkahahal.html #freeculture #creativecommons #fiction #horror